The Significance of Architectural Ideas

What is the signifi poopce of intriguerural subjects? The question begs the question of which architectural likings should be considered in the inaugural spotlight. While it may be genuine that there go been a huge number of architectural ideas since the root of human civilization, it is important to limit the question at hand. At the least, what hind end be done is to appropriately categorize architectural ideas according to their chronology. In doing so, we argon confining ourselves to a more specific and easier task. There is microscopic reason to doubt that earlier architectural ideas have influenced the more contemporary ones.Theories on how expressions are to be designed have long existed, perhaps as other(a) as the time when human beings began to first expect their dwellings and their places for worship and other accessible activities. For the most part, early civilizations had to consider their necessitate and means. They had to reflect on building structures for the sake of providing shelter, security and a place of worship. They likewise had to consider their level of architectural skills and the materials available during the time.These radical considerations for early architectural ideas are signifi stubt for the people back then since their necessarily and means limit what they can design and actually build which, as a consequence, delineate the characteristics of their architectural designs. In his De Architectura, Vitruvius fork overs one of the few live earliest examples of architectural designs. He suggests that good buildings should have three basic characteristics forte, utility, and dish aerial (Pellecchia, p. 378). Apparently, these three precepts have remained integral to modern architectural ideas.Thus, it is however fitting to say that these ideas are real inasmuch as they have assemble in motion a well-established standard in envisioning the designs of buildings disregarding of certain sizes and scopes. More i mportantly, these foundations for architectural ideas give rise to more abstruse yet more specific orgasmes in designing buildings according to the commensurateness between these basic precepts. For instance, an architect may give more election to utility over beauty without having to abandon the latter completely.Another architect may focus more on the aesthetics of the building without neglecting the durability of the structure. There are other influential architects in earlier generationsuch as Leon Battista Alberti and Augustus Welby Northmore Pugin, among othersbut it is sufficient to say that their contributions in footing of architectural ideas can never be denied. However, that is not to say that pertly architectural ideas have not materialized in more recent years, or that architects are simply confined to the ideas of the earlier generations.For example, the American architect Louis Sullivan who is considered to be the father of modernism once suggested that degree follows intimacy (Louis Sullivan and the Architecture of still Enterprise, p. 42). It has been an overriding force in 20th century architectural designs, influencing architects to shell out more consideration of the practical use of buildings rather than their aesthetics. The general counsellor of architecture at that time became more focuse on the mean function of buildings, thereby relegating its aesthetic aspects to a lesser ground level of importance.Buildings were designed according to how they go awaying facilitate their purpose, or how they will lead the immemorial intention behind their construction. A museum in New York, for instance, will have to be designed based on how a museum ought to function and not on how the structure will stand visually harmonic to its visitors. The phase angle follows function approach stands in direct contrast to the idea prevalent during the 19th century that architectural design should bestow more significance to aesthetics.John R uskin, for instance, proclaims that a building is not strictly a product of architectural ideas if it is not adorned in certain reckon (Bliss, p. 37). Thus, an office building will not only have to serve its purpose. Rather, it will overly have to be appealing to the senses of its occupants. The shape of the building will not only have to be sufficient sufficiency in order to accommodate the target number of occupants. It will also have to be ornamented with figures on its topmost floor, or its windows will also have to be visually appealing when viewed from a certain distance.This redoubtable clash between architectural ideas only signifies the fact that each idea belonging to a certain generation is presumably significant first within that generation and second to the generations which later used that idea as a platform for other architectural ideas. This observation is clearly manifested in the way 19th and 20th century architectural ideas stand in opposite ends. They contradic t each other in terms of approach but subsequent generations of architects may have found their own slipway to strike a balance between the two.Nevertheless, it is important to note that the primary concern for each of these generations is on the nature per se of the architectural design. In more recent times, the idea that architectural designs should follow the concept of sustainability reflects the intuitive feeling that these designs should also take into consideration the prevailing social and environmental conditions (Watson, p. 121). lots of what can be called sustainable buildings is designed in such a way that they minimize environmental hazards or that they promote an ecologically couthy environment.This type of architectural idea is significant today since it directly addresses study environmental concerns including the use of natural resources. For example, the use of wind turbines and solar panels in providing electricity to modern buildings can help lessen the dem and for electricity derived from coal-powered electric plants. Also, designing buildings with larger glass windows allows for sunlight to penetrate and provide the light, thereby reducing the need for light bulbs during the day.In essence, the approach places huge premium on the environmental effects of architectural designs, from lighting fixtures to the materials used in the ornamentation of the structure. With the continuous depletion of the planets natural resources and the perfect(a) threats to the environment, sustainable architectural designs significantly help in reducing the environmental dangers. If the proper allocation of earth-friendly materials for the aesthetic construction of a building reaches a global scale, there is reason to believe that the present environmental problems will be addressed in the long run with far-reaching benefits.As it can be observed, architectural ideas belonging to certain generations reflect the respective social conditions and aesthetic interpretations in those times. Looking back, the early architectural ideas still have their influence on contemporary designs. Architects still have to consider the durability, utility, and the beauty of the designs of their buildings, without which buildings will be devoid of use, will disintegrate faster and ramble thousands of lives in grave peril, and will look as though they are sore to the eyes so much so that they fail to animise those who dwell in them.Architects will also have to reflect on whether or not they have to put form over function, or the other way around, especially with regard to the very intention of wherefore the structure needs to be constructed. Ideas in the field of architecture can truly survive great lengths of time precisely because they remain significant not only for those who lived those ideas during their time but also for those architects today who attempt inspiration.One architectural idea may give rise to another. Or an architectural idea bei ng criticized for its preference for function over form may result to yet another idea harmonizing function and form into a single design. At any rate, it can be verbalize that the significance of architectural designs rests on their application. If they hardly apply to any quick need, they may lose their influence and eventually become mere footnotes in the annals of the history of architecture.