Supreme Court case that focuses on Criminal Law Research Paper

supreme Court case that focuses on Criminal Law - Research account ExampleOn October 31, 2001, the District Court reversed its decision and granted him the writ of habeas corpus, after find that his reasoning for requesting it was that his sentence of death was unconstitutional. Martin Horn, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections argued that the Supreme Court precedent did non require an outcome contrary to that reached by the take courts (536 U. S. ____ (2002). However, several other appellate and circuit courts ground discrepancies in the way in which the case was handled and that it violated several Constitutional Amendments.One of the major points increase in attempts to repeal the death sentence was a case involving Teague v. Lane. The reason for stating Teague was to declare its purpose regarding the states belief on criminal convictions depending upon the constitutional standards at the time of the actual proceedings. Amendments were made to the Tea gue ruling stating that these protectionist goals should be applied retroactively. The Supreme Court determined that federal courts must address the Teague question when it is properly argued by the government. The Court then proposed the matter of Caspari v. Bohlen, that Teagues nonretroactivity principle prevents a federal court from granting habeas corpus easing to a state prisoner based on a new curb, and thus that if the State ... argues that the defendant seeks the benefit of a new rule of constitutional law, the court must apply Teague before considering the merits of the claim. The Supreme Court then decided that it was necessary for them to reconsider Banks sentence according to the Teague case and that the case of mill around v. Maryland was more important (Justia US Law 2003). The final determination however was that it was unnecessary to rule retroactively regardless of the circumstances that might have made it an arguable point. The Supreme Court command that