History And Philosophy Of Psychology Essay

History and Philosophy of PsychologyAbstractThis essay answers the following two cheat object question : Critic altogethery canvass the state that semisynthetic positivity and mixer constructionism argon identical in rough serious respects . If they ar similar , what atomic number 18 the consequences of this for psycho coherent science s hereafter as a scientific discipline Conclusions are skeletal base on look into d wizardHistory and Philosophy of PsychologyCritically examine the claim that analytical incontrovertibleness and favorable constructionism are similar in around important respectsLogical advantageousness expositionLogical incontrovertibility holds that philosophy should purport to the selfsame(prenominal) sort of HYPERLINK http /encyclopedia .laborlawtalk .com /Rigor robustness as science and that it should provide strict criteria for judging sentences sure , glum and intendless (Dictionary .Labourtalk .com 2005Logical positivism made use of emblematical logical ashes , endorsed the verifiability principle as a criterion of meaning and bully importance to the analysis of language of meaning . Philosophers in this duration (1920 - 1936 ) included Schlick , Reichenbach and Carnap . Logical positivism was born from positivism , and preceded logical empiricism post positivism and post modernismSocial constructionism definitionSocial constructionism is defined as the view that the phenomena of the favorable and cultural world and their meanings are created in human social interaction . Taken still , social constructionism can be applied to social research itself . The border on often , though non exclusively , draws on idealist philosophical orientations (Seale , C 2004 ) The idealist seeks a reassure , consoling , kindred universe (Stove , 1991Similariti esThe received view is that logical positivi! sm and social constructionism are anti-thetical . However , because they are similar in some important regards , this received view is not an accurate one - the following three similarities can be cadaverous surrounded by the two disciplines Firstly , logical positivism exponents Schlick and Carnap disconnect what is cognize and experienced from scientific knowledge . The inwardness of extra-mental reality is in their eyes not possible .

as well , social constructionism draws a distinction between what is known and what is experiencedSecondly , logical positivism lengthens the doctrine of conventionalism from the comm only accepted principles of geometry to logic , math and some theoretical propositions . Social constructionism , albeit unwittingly , does the same to all propositions of scienceThirdly , Wittgenstein s `meaning as use thesis is drawn upon in both disciplines - in logical positivism , it is apply with Schlick s afterward defense of the verifiability principle and operationism , and in social constructionism it is invoked to bear come forward claims that all meanings of scientific terms are derived from the context of its usageIf they are similar , what are the consequences of this for psychology s future as a scientific disciplineThe Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler and Fowler , 1976 ) gives us the following definition of the term psychology : It is the science of the nature , functions and phenomena of the human mind or mind and the treatise on , or the system of this . Because it is found on a science psychology is therefore a scientific discipline . By nature , a s cientific discipline develops in stages and is influe! nced by the beliefs and thoughts of it s exponents at any given...If you poverty to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper