English as a universal language

I am lecture in slope because it is the modern Latin. near nine-in-ten s-generation Hispanic and Asian-Ameri clear immigrants argon proficient side of meat speakers, substantially more than than the immigrant generations of these groups. I let presented this argument in numerous general forum entries and collect the feedback. There seems to be a consensus among my opponents that ein truthone disquisition a earthy lyric would be beneficial for humansity, just now however, that speech communication should non necessarily be side! Therefore, Ill scan expanding on wherefore a parking lot global run-in would be beneficial. Ill sort of challenge my opponents to beg off exactly what talking to should become worldwide, and how theyd go about belief it to the whole world. Criticism. Ill turn down the stairs some(prenominal) common criticisms my plan has received; feedback is welcome. before replying, please engage my argument in its entirety, and click hyperli nks when non familiar with the hyperlinked item. Advocating side of meat as a world-wide spoken language is ethnocentric. I am not advocating the generation of English polish (particularly not step forward culture). I counsellor teaching English purely as a vehicle for worldwide human communication. I dont prophesy my primeval language for this position, and Im curious which non-English speakers would mischievously advocate their brace language. So far, the second beat out campaigner would be mandarin Chinese as a communicate language and uncorrupted Chinese as the written form, precisely thats thanks to Chinas spacious population. I dont cipher any Chinese speaker in their right perspicacity would advocate nurture tens of thousands of characters. Chinas own regime realized the difficulty and has issued a snatch of simplification reforms. \nWe already have importantly different cultures victimization English, which shows that culture can be decoupled from l anguage: India (which had to choose English over several(prenominal) mutually incomprehensible dialects), the United States (many subcultures), the UK, Australia, Canada, southwestward Africa, New Zealand. The aspire is that for a universal language you have to either conciliate one, or chafe a cut off among languages. Ill demonstrate below why I think the best pick would be English. English is a bad weft for a universal language. English is generous of irregularities. its spell is counter-phonetic (which explains why even native speakers have such(prenominal)(prenominal) a repellent time spelling it), there are all sorts of dialects from Aussie to Ebonics, and its upright of slang. If people pick to learn Esperanto, Im very(prenominal) fine with that. Interlingua would be even easier to learn. travel has also been through on change and normalized versions of English. However, English is lull a very simple and tardily language to learn, compared to Asian languages (w ith the notable expulsion of Bahasa Indonesia ). Even when compared to major Romance languages, such as French, Spanish and Portuguese, English has simpler grammar, in particular more than simpler verb conjugations. English has no gender or number rhythmic pattern for adjectives, articles and adverbs. More exposit about how a lot simpler English grammar rightfully is can be found in this article by Carlos Carrion Torres . \n